Nu eens heel wat anders dan anders.Op http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?WikiNature wordt gediscussieerd over wat Wiki-writing is en wie nu eigenlijk in Wiki schrijft.Lees even een stukje mee:

“…Reminds me of the TaoTeChing -Knowledgeable people don’t talk;Talkative people don’t know.( http://www.chinapage.org/gnl.html#56 )————————————————————-It is reversed on the Wiki: Knowledgeable people do talk, and Talkative people do know.Sometimes true, but often not. Wiki attracts a few of the relatively talkative among the knowledgeable, but still attracts some of the talkative among the unknowledgeable as well. But how, I whine, will I ever know if what I read on Wiki was written by a WiseMan or a talkative fool? I know I can’t trust everything I read in the papers, but is Wiki a paper?Wiki does not redefine human nature, it only attracts a subset of it; and it does not really constrain that subset very much.

[Bron: http://www.c2.com - de eerste Wiki ter wereld op internet]